Skip to comments.New Civil Rights Group Joins Affirmative Action Case
Posted on 01/11/2013 7:13:37 AM PST by MichCapCon
More than six years after voters approved the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, supporters are rallying to convince the U.S. Supreme Court to keep it in place.
The latest effort came on Thursday when the XIV Foundation filed an amicus brief in support of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative. Voters in 2006 passed the constitutional amendment that prohibited the state from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any group or individual on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin by a 58 percent to 42 percent margin.
However, on Nov. 15, eight federal judges on the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals struck the initiative down. In response, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette asked the Supreme Court to reverse that decision. With its amicus brief, the XIV Foundation joined Schuettes effort.
"Much progress has been made over the past 15 years in challenging the discriminatory policies that are errantly described as affirmative action policies," said Jennifer Gratz, co-founder of the XIV Foundation. Eight judges put this progress at risk when they decided to overturn MCRI and the will of over 2.1 million Michigan voters who chose equality over discrimination.
Gratz was the plaintiff in an racial discrimination case against the University of Michigan (Gratz v. Bollinger) that made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In 2003, Justices ruled 6-3 that the university's undergraduate admissions policy was unconstitutional.
The XIV Foundation was founded shortly after the 6th Circuit Court decision. It took the name XIV, in reference to the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The organization's motto is: "Equal Treatment is the Essence of Equal Rights."
In light of the fact that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has twice upheld a constitutional amendment in California that has the exact same language as MCRI, the XIV brief argues that lower courts need firm, clear direction on this issue," Gratz said. "Without such clarity ... states and federal courts will continue to struggle with race and gender equity and, in so doing, stymie citizen-led progress toward racial equality."
By Any Means Necessary (BAMN), the group that has been fighting the MCRI, could file a legal response in the case soon. This would likely speed up the time frame for the U.S. Supreme Court to determine whether it will take up the matter. Under this faster track scenario if the high court takes it up the case could play out as soon as the autumn of 2013.
However, many legal experts believe it is more likely that the case will move on a somewhat slower track. If so (and if the U.S. Supreme Court decides to take up the case) the time frame for action would likely be in the spring or summer of 2014.
Gratz also was active in efforts to pass the MCRI.
Signatories to the XIV Foundation amicus brief include:
Larry Arnn president, Hillsdale College; founding chairman, California Civil Rights Initiative Glynn Custred author, California Civil Rights Initiative Rachel Alexander chairman, Arizona Civil Rights Initiative Marc Schniederjans chairman, Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative Leon Drolet chairman, Michigan Civil Rights Initiative Rep. Gary Hooper state representative, New Hampshire; sponsor of the New Hampshire Civil Rights Initiative State Rep. Pete Lund, R-Shelby Township State Sen. Joe Hune, R-Hamburg Township State Sen. Dave Robertson , R-Grand Blanc
Affirmative Action is the only way for incompetent people to get jobs .
It will always be around just as the nepotism of Hollywood movie stars will always be around.
Thanks for the ping;post. Neo-collectives supporting paleo-collectives appealing to current collectivists in government.
Of the collective, for the collective, by the collective BUMP!
“Can the law which necessarily requires the use of force rationally be used for anything except protecting the rights of everyone? I defy anyone to extend it beyond this purpose without perverting it and, consequently, turning might against right. This is the most fatal and most illogical social perversion that can possibly be imagined. It must be admitted that the true solution so long searched for in the area of social relationships is contained in these simple words: Law is organized justice.”
“The person who profits from this law will complain bitterly, defending his acquired rights. He will claim that the state is obligated to protect and encourage his particular industry; that this procedure enriches the state because the protected industry is thus able to spend more and to pay higher wages to the poor workingmen.”
“Do not listen to this sophistry by vested interests. The acceptance of these arguments will build legal plunder into a whole system. In fact, this has already occurred. The present-day delusion is an attempt to enrich everyone at the expense of everyone else; to make plunder universal under the pretense of organizing it.”
“Is there any need to offer proof that this odious perversion of the law is a perpetual source of hatred and discord; that it tends to destroy society itself?”
“It is as if it were necessary, before a reign of justice appears, for everyone to suffer a cruel retribution some for their evilness, and some for their lack of understanding.”
Quotes - Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850) “The Law”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.