[Standing Wolf]

I have a hunch the loudly self-proclaimed “progressives” and Republicans in Congress believe we’ll settle for another so-called “compromise:” they’ll allow us to keep our so-called “assault weapons” for now, but we’ll have to accept a ten-round magazine limit and background checks for all firearms sales. The “progressives” and Republicans will do everything short of dislocate their shoulders patting themselves on their backs for being so “reasonable.” The failed main stream “news” media will hail President You Didn’t Build That as the man who finally broke the NRA’s back and made American school kids safe.

Have we ever encountered “progressives” and Republicans who believe in “compromise?”

[OneWingedShark]

I have a hunch the loudly self-proclaimed “progressives” and Republicans in Congress believe we’ll settle for another so-called “compromise:” they’ll allow us to keep our so-called “assault weapons” for now, but we’ll have to accept a ten-round magazine limit and background checks for all firearms sales.

At that point the war is on: we'll need to ensure logistics and planning (guerrilla-warfare).
And active non-compliance with gun-"laws" that are even now on the books: we can have "make your own auto" parties, and such.

[Paladin2]

If the RINOS can’t even protect the freedom of 75W and 100W incandescent light bulbs while simultaneously banning Hg filled thermometers while forcing Hg filled CFLs, how are they going to fight for gun rights?