“As I’ve said, the very best that Onaka could do at this point would be to contradict himself - which would STILL be reason to see the original records and sort the whole thing out in a court of law. “
Or he would be verifying what he has already said. It would on the other hand contradict your theory.
I’m surprised you don’t even want to try to get more information.
Onaka has given 3 consistent verifications already. The information we need now are the microfilms, computer transaction logs, and paper records for Obama’s birth certificate, social security number registration, draft registration, and passport files.
Anything short of that is just as likely to be a lie or deception as to be true. Why would Obama be unwilling to have any of those things shown? If there were legal doubts about my documentation I’d let law enforcement look at everything in any of those files for me at the blink of an eye.
In fact, law enforcement has already checked me out far better than Obama has ever been checked out, and that’s just because I reported Bob Bauer’s crimes. My credibility is far, far more important than the credibility of the guy who holds the nuclear football.
You didn’t know you were talking to somebody so important, did you?
“...because the only credible information that this Court has received and has been released was from the Director of the Hawaii Health Department who has certified and attested to the authenticity of the certified copies of the original certificate of live birth which was published approximately a year and a half ago. That is credible testimony.”
Judge England from a transcript of Grinols v Electoral College, 3 Jan 2013.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/120844360/Transcript-of-Grinols-v-Electoral-College-3-Jan-2013