I know all that. My point is, if we keep saying we need more rounds available, and there is no good evidence on this, eventually some gun-grabber will do some research on it himself. If it ends up that 99% of home self-defense incidents resulted in only a few rounds being fired, our credibility is reduced and they will pounce on that. I don’t want that. That is why I’m asking if there are any freepers with this data, they should make it available for our arguments.
Just need the correct reply. Like “larger magazines - if they save just one life...” and point out the poor woman that only had five shots - and the perp survived and might have continued to be a threat...