Please see my #51. This is similar to the gun-grabbers saying you don’t need 20 rounds for hunting. Anyone that hunts, knows this is true, you really don’t...unless you’re trying to shoot doves, then you need fully auto.
Even though well-intentioned, if we keep saying we need large capacity mags for home defense the only data on that shows it to not be true a majority of the time, it weakens our position and I don’t want that. The media will ping on that as a fact. I don’t want our only defense to be...because I may need it.
We won’t have a position if we can’t answer the questions I posted. If we do not deserve to be armed, as a people, we WILL lose the right.
The answer to the wrong question is to ask the right one. I do not want to “help” the lib-tard Media “debate” gun-control. Their “debate” is over how to do it, and talking about magazine capacity is simply and ONLY part of that discussion.
If you are arguing this issue, you have already lost the debate. There is no way to “win” a debate with someone making a falacious argument.