I don’t know, what does your state law provide?
Federal courts can and have resolved state electoral issues. See Bush v. Gore.
If you are not aware of it, you should check into Voeltz v. Obama. Judge Carroll’s behavior is appalling. I believe this case has moved up to appellate court. It eventually could go to the US Supreme Court.
Regarding judge Carroll:
Making remarks not relevant to the proof of any legal or factual issue in dispute is a violation of R. Regulating Fla. Bar 4-8.4(d)
Judge Carroll’s citing “Miracle on 34th St.” and his statements concerning Obama’s “appointment of The Honorable Mark Walker, formerly a member of this Court” are not relevant to the proof of any legal or factual issue in dispute.
Also: Fla. Stat. § 760.51(1) Whenever any person, whether or not acting under color of law, interferes by threats, intimidation, or coercion, or attempts to interfere by threats, intimidation, or coercion, with the exercise or enjoyment by any other person of rights secured by the State Constitution or laws of this state, the Attorney General may bring a civil or administrative action for damages, and for injunctive or other appropriate relief for violations of the rights secured.
Acting under color of law, Judge Carroll has interfered with Voeltz’s rights secured by the State Constitution of Florida or the laws of Florida.
In my opinion Judge Carroll has at a minimum violated Fla. Stat. § 760.51(1) and R. Regulating Fla. Bar 4-8.4(d)
It’s likely there are Federal civil rights violations as well, in my opinion.