“In terms of the document presented as the copy of Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate on the official White House web site...”
What the courts care about is this: HAWAII says Obama was born there.
The moment the government of Hawaii says Obama wasn’t born in Hawaii, the courts will take the accusation seriously. Until then...sorry, but courts are not interested in what is posted on the web.
Let us try again
You said
"""...... courts HAVE heard the merits of these cases at times, and rejected them""""""
So I asked You.
"In terms of the document presented as the copy of Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate on the official White House web site, tell us, what court has allowed discovery,had experts examine the evidence and ruled on its merits?"
You did not answer my question but rather attempted to change the subject!
Please, first answer my question and then we can talk about what the courts want.....
Frankly, I do not know where he was born. I suspect he was born in Kenya but I am not sure. However, I am certain that the document he presented to show us that was born in Hawaii is a digital fabricated fraud.
“”””What the courts care about is this: HAWAII says Obama was born there.......””””
You know, I do not recall that there was any court that has heard any evidence that Hawaii claimed Obama was born there. I could be corrected. I think your talking about correspondence between Hawaii and attorney generals of some states. If evidence were submitted that Hawaii claimed Obama was born there, a plaintiff’s request for discovery would be granted and plaintiffs attorneys would be able to depose and cross exsamine Hawaian officials.