To: ABrit
“Why did the prosecutor quash a warrant on a nobody from Jamaica?”
Maybe he was dead? Maybe he cut a deal with the prosecutors? Maybe they do that automatically after a certain time with minor warrants, rather than clogging up the system?
Any of those would make more sense than that they “quashed” the warrant to protect Obama, when the warrant wasn’t in Obama’s name, so he had no danger of being arrested under it.
“If Obamas legal name and person was Bari Malik Shabazz he Obama was in criminal legal jeopardy.”
Well, he wasn’t, so there was no jeopardy.
To: Boogieman
Well if Shabazz was finger printed when arrested and Obama had the same prints, then Obama was in danger of arrest every time he was fingerprinted.
24 posted on
01/22/2013 2:28:06 AM PST by
ABrit
(awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
To: Boogieman
Well if Shabazz was finger printed when arrested and Obama had the same prints, then Obama was in danger of arrest every time he was fingerprinted.
25 posted on
01/22/2013 2:28:06 AM PST by
ABrit
(awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
To: Boogieman
Why did the prosecutor quash a warrant on a nobody from Jamaica?
Maybe he was dead? Maybe he cut a deal with the prosecutors? Maybe they do that automatically after a certain time with minor warrants, rather than clogging up the system?
Any of those would make more sense than that they quashed the warrant to protect Obama.....
They wouldn't know he was dead, there's no reason to suppose they "cut a deal", I doubt if Courts cancel warrants for "failing to appear" under any circumstances relevant here.
31 posted on
01/22/2013 7:50:49 AM PST by
ABrit
(awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson