Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian; butterdezillion

“...because the only credible information that this Court has received and has been released was from the Director of the Hawaii Health Department who has certified and attested to the authenticity of the certified copies of the original certificate of live birth which was published approximately a year and a half ago. That is credible testimony.”

Judge England from a transcript of Grinols v Electoral College, 3 Jan 2013.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/120844360/Transcript-of-Grinols-v-Electoral-College-3-Jan-2013


141 posted on 01/31/2013 12:44:29 PM PST by Natufian (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: Natufian

That hearing was a travesty.

The judge references hearing from the HDOH. Who filed that document from the HDOH to the judge, when, and what document was it? He says it is the only credible information that the Court received. When did they receive it, in what form, and from whom?

It has to be a different document than anything that’s been known publicly, because the HDOH has NEVER certified the authenticity of what was posted online, and when Ken Bennett specifically asked the HDOH to verify either the genuineness of the online image or the actual birth facts, ONAKA REFUSED.

So unless this judge has a document that nobody knows about, he is a bald-faced liar.

Show me the documents.


144 posted on 01/31/2013 1:19:24 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson