Soros is one man, a rich one, but no James Bond supervillain. If you really think he has the power to collapse the world economy, perhaps you have some evidence of this?
And if he could, do you think no member of Congress would publicize-- and thereby neutralize-- the threat?
And if his threat were so fearsome that no one would call him out, why wouldn't he threaten the court as well?
So, even by your theory-- which, most respectfully, sounds like something out of a comic book, not a law book-- there is no reason to add a meaningless layer of judicial review to a process which the 20th Amendment assigns to Congress.
Kevin Freeman, “Secret Weapon”. The Sept 2008 run on the bank was economic terrorism.
The Islamists and communists are united against America and capitalism. Imagine all the money of world communists and all the money of world Islamists, and then imagine them united under George Soros (the self-declared owner of the democratic party). That’s the kind of power we’re talking about. And Freeman points out that both the communists and Islamists have planned on using this kind of economic terrorism to pull down America. Very deliberate stuff. HE goes into the different layers needed to make this plan work.
According to Bettina Viviano who was told by high-ups in the Hillary machine, George Soros asked both Hillary and Obama during the 2008 primary whether they were on-board with his plans to destroy the US economy; Obama was.
I don’t think you understand the nature of the threat. Any move that Soros didn’t like, and he could send the signal for another run on the bank that would end the world as we know it. Do you remember GW Bush telling the country that economic Armageddon was upon us if we didn’t pass TARP? That was the same day that John McCain suspended his campaign and asked for all the debates to be canceled. Obama was ho-hum. He knew all about it so it didn’t worry him a bit. In fact, McCain and Palin were leading in the polls until right after that run on the bank. It was geared toward getting Obama in the White House. Shortly after that Soros threatened the media heads, supposedly with FCC and FEC annihilation after the election if they reported on Obama’s eligibility problems. But it was Bush’s DOJ and administration at the time so that threat doesn’t make sense because they COULD just report the threats and make sure that Obama was never elected. It had to be some other threat, and it had to be very, very serious.
Do you remember Bush talking about economic Armageddon? Do you remember communists like Chavez and Castro saying that “Since capitalism has failed the world should try communism”? Do you remember Islamists like Zawahiri and Ahmadinejad saying, “Since capitalism has failed, the world should try Islamic finance”? Do you remember that the TARP money went primarily to foreign shariah-compliant banks - very likely the people who helped pull off the run on the bank - and that nobody in the federal government investigated who made the run on the bank?
I believe he did threaten the courts. I believe that the more conscientious of the judges put out red flags to let us know they were acting under duress. Stuff like claiming that 4 years’ worth of Military Reserve pay doesn’t add up to the $500 minimum, or inviting Obama to visit the Supreme Court for an ex parte visit on the same day that the Supreme Court was supposed to be giving an unbiased decision on whether to hear Donofrio’s eligibility case, or hiring a clerk from Perkins-Coie at the very same time as doing a total 180-degree reversal in both manner and decision in a pending eligibility case, or not certifying a transcript of the court case so that Obama and his lawyer could not be held in contempt of court, or claiming that a case was frivolous because Obama’s eligibility had already been decided on Twitter.... etc.
The timing of all of this stuff falls right into line. When you realize what happened and look at the sequence of events things that didn’t make sense before make sense.
This explains why Ghadaffi said in a public speech that the Muslim world had contributed to Obama’s campaign (remember the disabling of the credit card verification?) It explains why Obama felt that after one year in office he had to explain in private to the Egyptian ambassador why he was taking so long delivering on the “Muslim agenda” - because he had to get Obamacare passed first. (The agenda all sects of Islam agree on are the destruction of the US and Israel and the institution of worldwide sharia). It explains millions in US tax dollars going to Kenya to push for a Constitution that allowed sharia there (as was included in Obama’s cousin, Raila Odinga’s Memorandum of Understanding with the Muslims there - if they did violence to get him in power he would help institute sharia - and Obama helped deliver on his cousin’s promise, using US tax dollars).
Ah, there’s too much to go over. Too many dots that contribute to a clear picture.
Ret. Col Lawrence Sellin overheard one of the R Presidential primary candidates explaining why nobody would touch the eligibility issue: because it goes far, far deeper than anybody was willing to delve.
There is way, way more that I could say on this stuff, but I’d suggest you read Freeman’s book. There’s a review of it at http://globaleconomicwarfare.com/2012/12/review-of-secret-weapon-from-a-european-view/ If you think this is all far-out speculation, then you’re living as if it’s still 9-10-01. If you’re not aware of the Cloward-Piven Plan and Obama’s role in preparing the country for this strategy of economic manipulation and terrorism, then you need to read up.
So anyway, if you don’t think this is real then just consider it as a hypothetical. If Congress and judges can be threatened by an economy literally taken hostage by enemies seeking to install a foreign enemy combatant in our White House, what in our system and Constitution protects us from that?