Replies

Troll is a mindset, not a level of experience.

How did you respond when Judge Robertson ruled that an eligibility lawsuit was frivolous because Obama’s legal eligibility had already been decided on Twitter? Your response tells us whether you are a lawyer, or a troll.

How did you respond when Judge Carter hired a clerk from Perkins-Coie while in the middle of a prominent case being argued by Perkins-Coie? How did you respond when shortly after hiring that clerk Judge Carter did a total reversal on that case that was being argued by Perkins-Coie? Again, the way you respond to that tells us whether you are a lawyer, or a troll.

How did you respond when it was ruled that 4 years’ worth of Army Reserves pay did not meet the $500 threshold to make a “case”?

How did you respond when Chief Justice Roberts took the unprecedented step of inviting Obama to visit the Supreme Court on the same day that SCOTUS was conferring on Donofrio’s eligibility case?

How did you respond when Kagan and Sotomayor refused to recuse themselves from conferring on a case where their very jobs were the issue?

How did you respond when Judge Surick reversed everything he had done and all of a sudden decided that democratic contributor Phil Berg had no particularized harm if the money he contributed to get an eligible candidate resulted instead in a candidate who could be booted out for ineligibility?

How did you respond when Bettina Viviano revealed that Hillary’s top advisors shared that the plan had always been to challenge Obama’s eligibility at the 2008 DNC Convention, but that the plan was thwarted when 2 people - Bill Gwatney and Stephanie Tubbs - were each killed in succession in the weeks before the convention shortly after they each agreed to present the petition, and Hillary and Bill only finally dropped the issue when Chelsea’s life was threatened?

How did you respond when Judge Malihi declared Obama eligible after presenting no evidence, when he had already said that the burden of proof fell on Obama to prove his eligibility? Did you object to that “judge’s knowledge”, Iran mullah-style sharia ruling?

How did you respond when Judge Malihi refused to certify the court proceedings so the transcript could be sent upwards for a higher judge to consider contempt of court charges against Obama and his lawyer, who were both ordered to appear and didn’t?

How did you respond when the GA appeals court secretary refused to file the pleadings, so that the appeals judge actually gave a verdict before the secretary had allowed any case to be filed?

How did you respond when the judge in the Voeltz case in FL threw out a case with guaranteed standing, claiming none of it mattered because Obama was President for the last 4 years?

How did you respond when a military judge ruled that the Constitutional ability of a person to “act as President” is irrelevant to the lawfulness of combat orders that by the War Powers Act can only be authorized by someone acting as the Constitutional Commander-in-Chief?

How did you respond when a judge’s assistant told Orly Taitz that she could have witnesses in her 20-minute allotted timespan, but ordered no witnesses while her witnesses were in mid-flight? How did you respond when most of her 20 minutes were taken up by the judge claiming that he controls everything and it doesn’t matter what his assistant said or what her doofus mistakes cost Taitz?

How did you respond when Linda Jordan presented an affidavit alerting judges to law enforcements’ probative evidence for fraud (which is what the statute allowed her to report and demanded action from the judge to remedy) and the judge ignored reported state and federal fraud and forgery?

See, trollishness is behavior. These are serious ethics violations. Show me where you stood for integrity by your fellow lawyers, or please excuse me while I go vomit from exposure to lawyers.