LOL typical lib stuff, social conservatives are right wingers, who vote conservative 75 and 80% of the time.
Social liberals are left wingers who vote left wing 70 and 80%.
Libertarians with all their leftist/anti-conservative/anti-God/anti-Christian goals, from partial birth abortion and gay marriage to polygamy and open borders, with plenty of drugs and hooker to fill the dull moments, breed leftist voters.
Libertarians see all of America becoming a third world ghetto, and then claim that in return all of them will vote against the social programs that broken people and broken lives, and third world immigrants want, and will for some BIZARRE reason, start voting like Evangelicals.
Social liberalism will only produce more voters who will vote to take what they want, not fewer.
Social liberalism, destroys families and communities, and morality, and breeds good liberal voters, in that battle, conservatives fight for conservatism, and libertarians fight for the left in an effort to destroy all the remnants of pre-1960s America.
Speaking for myself, I consider myself a (small-l) libertarian. I consider myself an economic conservative. I do not consider myself a social liberal -- it's more like I care much more about the economic side.
Case in point: If I was in the legislature, and I could vote to drastically curtail welfare, I would do so even if a likely side-effect was an increase in abortions among the underclass.
If you were in that position (voting on a bill that would greatly curtail welfare, and greatly reduce the number of future underclass, at the cost of a short-term increase in abortion), and your only choices were for, against, or abstain, how would you vote?