Hmmm....
Posted on 02/12/2013 11:09:04 AM PST by Uncle Chip
Meanwhile the Defense is closing in on DeeDee:
MOTION FOR SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO STATE WITNESS, CIVILIAN WITNESS 8
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/motion_std_witness_8.pdf
The only thing I have read (I live in Florida) is that they got data from it...except for the day that he attacked Martin. Somehow, there was mysteriously no data on that day. They said the charge had probably run out.
That’s highly unlikely, since people like him (drug dealers) keep their phones charged morning, noon and night.
So while they may release a few descriptions of places he visited, the fact that they “can’t find” his record for that day is beyond suspicious.
The cell phone towers would still have a record of the “pings” showing the cell phone was on and in contact.
That would indicate there was evidence but that it was removed. IOW spoiliation of evidence which is grounds for dismissal.
Wasn't his girlfriend talking to him on that phone? I thought they had testimony from this girl about talking to him and that he told her someone was following him.
“it was a complete mystery as to who, what, when and where some mystery person took the cell phone, unbeknownst to O’Mara, out of the evidence room of the FDLE and shipped it off to some mystery place in California were apparently the phone was accessed and sent back to the FDLE.”
Sounds like a serious break in the chain of custody to me...........the whole think stinks of tampering IMHO.
Obviously the evidence collected from the phone was not helpful to the prosecution, which has controlled custody and access to the phone since soon after the incident took place.
Occam’s razor, folks.
Yes, that’s what’s so strange about it. He was clearly in contact with people...and now they say there’s no record of this?
The area is a regular urban/suburban area and is stuffed with cell phone relay points, so there couldn’t have been a gap.
So what happened to those calls?
Dear Prosecution,
Please contact Mike Nifong to see what happens when you continue to prosecute a case even after evidence proves those charged to be not-guilty.
Thank you,
A concerned citizen
Everyone who watches NCIS knows you can’t change the timestamp on files or the data themselves in a phone! (do I need the /sarc tag?)
I’m sure they have the info, but as you say, the problem was that it didn’t support the “official” (government) case.
It’s definitely evidence tampering - but who is going to prove it? Martin’s defense is being blocked at every turn.
Even more obvious is that the evidence it contained was exculpatory which is why they have dragged their feet in turning over the contents to the defense counsel.
Hmmm....
“Martin’s defense is being blocked at every turn.”
That would be Zimmerman’s defense...Martin’s dead.
Mystery person taking the phone from the evidence room, along with it’s being shipped all over the place via Fed Ex is a bunch of crap. Why didn’t they simply send it to the FBI and have them crack it? Too many hands handling the thing. The chain of custody on this evidence leaves a lot to be desired.
Could that place be LAPD.
Obvious that the prosecution has tampered w evidence. Enough to have DeeDee testimony thrown out....and enough to toss conviction on appeal
Perry Kuhl — Santa Barbara Sheriffs Department
It's directed at DeeDee and it's supposed to be turned over prior to her deposition.
They want anything that she has with Trayvon's voice on it -- like messages on her phone.
Let's see if they get anything ----
With no continuance on the horizon this thing could move rather quickly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.