To: ABrit
The way I understand the case, The California Court failed to act in a timely fashion on the Orly Taitz case. (her suit was ~~~Obama did not qualify under CA law to be on the CA presidential ballot for several reasons, also there were 1.5 million illegally registered voters) so by default it went to the Supreme court on the 15th. The decision (to hear the case) is due out this Tuesday.
“Appellants motion to vacate the dismissal, reinstate the appeal, and be relieved from default is GRANTED. The order of dismissal is VACATED and the appeal is REINSTATED. Orange County Superior Court, Appellate Division is directed to accept the designation of the record on appeal, provided the designation is presented within 10 days of the date of this order.”
To: stormryter
What was before the Justices in Conference last Friday was an application for a stay of the certification of the results of the general election in California.
Here’s the Supreme Court docket:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm
It is not a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari which would be asking the Justices to hear an appeal of Noonan v Bowen.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson