That’s one interpretation but it seems to be believed by no one else but you.
It is believed by at least 6 hostile attorneys.
I’ll ask you directly:
Why did Onaka mention Honolulu but not any of the other items Bennett specifically requested to be verified in the application? He certified that he obeyed the law; what does the law allow as a reason for the failure to verify those things?
Why did somebody at the HDOH alter the 1960-64 birth index so that it would include SELECTED non-valid records?