Replies

The voters and their electors decide who is and who is not eligible.

Saying it loudly doesn't make it any less stupid. The voters don't get to decide what is "Arms", nor do they get to decide what is "speech."

The meaning of terms of art are not subject to voter approval.

How come the federal judiciary keeps refusing to make findings of fact and decisions regarding Obama's qualifications? Do you think that they agree with those of you who think it's their job to review candidate qualifications but "they just can't find the time" to get to a little case like this one?

Or, do you think it's possible that they agree with me that they have no role to play in the selection of our presidents?

The Constitution makes it clear that our presidents are to be selected by the electors.

If you think the electors made a mistake (which is possible), then there are procedures for impeachment. The House of Representatives (not any court) has the "sole" power of impeachment. And, if you think that the House is making a mistake in not impeaching a president, what then? Shouldn't you be able to go to court and have a judge order the House to impeach? Why, of course. We can't permit the House to make (in your judgment) a mistake when it's their duty to impeach, can we? Isn't it the Supreme Court's job to make sure no one in this country makes any mistaken decisions?

There's another case for Orly. Take the Congress to court!!! And, if the Supreme Court refuses to correct the House's mistake, then take the Supreme Court to court. Since Orly might have a conflict, we could hire Larry Klayman for that case.

Please, listen to what the judiciary is trying to tell you folks. It's not their job to pick or remove presidents.