[Jeff Winston]

I think you have done something similar with your graph. It simply says what you want it to say because it's based on your whim. It is proof of nothing.

That could ACCURATELY be said of every single thing you've ever written on this subject.

As for my graph, it is simply a SUMMARY of the HISTORICAL and ACCEPTED meaning of natural born citizen. You know, the one that is adhered to by every significant historical authority, and every conservative constitutional organization there is?

I suppose this would be a good time to repost it, for anyone getting to the conversation late.

[RegulatorCountry]

I’m in the graphics industry. That graph lacks polish. The typograpy in particular looks as if it were done in Microsoft Word.

You created yourself didn’t you?

[DiogenesLamp]

That could ACCURATELY be said of every single thing you've ever written on this subject.

Only if the world existed inside your head. Seriously, it takes a rare combination of stupidity and chutzpah to create your own graph, then cite it as proof that you are right.

As for my graph, it is simply a SUMMARY of the HISTORICAL and ACCEPTED meaning of natural born citizen. You know, the one that is adhered to by every significant historical authority, and every conservative constitutional organization there is?

From the world according to Jeff. And there you go again, with that argumentum ad verecundiam/ argumentum ad populum. Do you have a NON-Fallacy argument?

So Jeffy makes up a graphic, and then points to it as evidence he is right. What a childish thing to do.