[scripter]

The one thing I don't understand is why he says that Hooker's report was discredited in 1993.

Probably because it was. Sorry, but the Hooker study is one I've reported on a few times and it should have been discredited at the outset. I'm not the only one here who's reported on it either. I'll see what I can find.

[Hildred Castaigne]

Probably because it was. Sorry, but the Hooker study is one I've reported on a few times and it should have been discredited at the outset. I'm not the only one here who's reported on it either. I'll see what I can find.

Thank you! :) I'll look forward to seeing it (and discussing it). I like a good back-and-forth.