I would say that the lawsuit is not an ‘official source’ for the purposes of determining eligibility. If you’re talking about what Arpiao is doing, he can’t even get an indictment based on what he has so how could the Alabama Secretary of State be expected to consider that?
Arpaio can’t get an indictment not because he doesn’t have good solid evidence, but because no one wants to touch it.
“I would say that the lawsuit is not an ‘official source’ for the purposes of determining eligibility. If you’re talking about what Arpiao is doing, he can’t even get an indictment based on what he has so how could the Alabama Secretary of State be expected to consider that?”
Official source of credible evidence candidate is not eligible for placement on Alabama ballot is the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio. The fact that there hasn’t been an indictment doesn’t dismiss Sheriff Arapio’s allegation of credible evidence of forgery exists.
Shouldn’t the Alabama Sec of State investigate based on Sheriff Arapaio’s affidavit?