Orly Taitz now has two eligibility cases pending before judges appointed by Ronald Reagan. Those cases will be dismissed, not because those judges are liberals or because the cases are fixed, but because of well-settled principles of law, including standing, mootness and the political question doctrine.
& then there’s this gem: “I have no idea if Obama’s draft registration is OK or not; I am not a forensic document examiner, and I have never posted any comment on that issue one way or another. I do know that any discrepancy in the draft records of a sitting President is not something that gives any U.S. court jurisdiction to remove the President from office.” Did you actually type that? If so, does the plaque on your door read ‘CA DNC’? Because otherwise it makes no sense. A human being cares that Obama’s draft registration is a complete & glaring fake. You don’t even have to be a conservative to care.
Apparently, reading comprehension is not your strong suit (odd, for someone who claims to be a writer). I never said I didn't care if his Selective Service registration is forged; I said I don't post about it because it is outside my expertise as a lawyer. On the eligibility threads (and most threads, for that matter), I post about legal issues because my professional background gives me something to add to the discussion.
Only a liberal believes court cases today are decided on the law. Conservatives have seen for decades now that ideology trumps all else. Maybe if you had caught me twenty years ago you might be able to make me believe the outrageous lie that judges decide cases on merits. Even then I would have been skeptical. Today it just makes me wonder. Do you even believe this stuff yourself???
“& then there’s this gem: “I have no idea if Obama’s draft registration is OK or not; I am not a forensic document examiner, and I have never posted any comment on that issue one way or another. I do know that any discrepancy in the draft records of a sitting President is not something that gives any U.S. court jurisdiction to remove the President from office.” Did you actually type that? If so, does the plaque on your door read ‘CA DNC’? Because otherwise it makes no sense. A human being cares that Obama’s draft registration is a complete & glaring fake. You don’t even have to be a conservative to care.
Apparently, reading comprehension is not your strong suit (odd, for someone who claims to be a writer). I never said I didn’t care if his Selective Service registration is forged; I said I don’t post about it because it is outside my expertise as a lawyer. On the eligibility threads (and most threads, for that matter), I post about legal issues because my professional background gives me something to add to the discussion.”
So now it is ‘reading comprehension’ not to see that you meant the opposite of what you said? I.e.: to see how much you care about Obama’s lying, cheating, forging, law-breaking ways when all you actually said was that he’d be in no legal jeopardy.
Your definition of reading comprehension: mind-reading. (If in fact anything of that sort [i.e.: concern about Obama’s fundamental lack of integrity] was actually in your mind to begin w—& there’s no indication it was.
You want credit for things you didn’t say & never said or even suggested. Worse, you blame me for not knowing about all these things you didn’t say & have never said. That is sick. Really, really sick.