Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 4Zoltan; Rides3; WildHighlander57

Hawaii births were “subject to the jurisdiction” under the 14A to the same extent as in any other state in 1961. There was NO distinction for HI or AK births.

Statutes cannot change the constitution. Statutes can change naturalization of Indians and natives but not the birth status of 14A constitutional citizens, such as Barry claims to be in in HI in 1961.


69 posted on 04/09/2013 11:11:03 PM PDT by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp
Hawaii births were “subject to the jurisdiction” under the 14A to the same extent as in any other state in 1961.

Statutes cannot change the constitution.

Exactly so. Thanks for the clarification!

70 posted on 04/10/2013 1:46:03 AM PDT by Rides3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson