Now, 4zoltan, the shred of hope I had that you would try to maintain the appearance of intellectual integrity is fading. In the last few posts, you’ve raised several points and questions. In my opinion, the responses that a person from my perspective would offer to most of them will be immediately evident to most any discerning observers who might be tuning in to this discussion.
I’ll take the time for one quick example, but then I must get back to my day job.
Has Mike Zullo been granted access to the SSS microfilm record or national archive microfilm records, or is anyone contending that Zullo has been granted or could be granted that access at this point? Remember that I did mention the SSS changed its own rules; to be more specific, they did so such that going forward only federal law enforcement entities (i.e. entities that are generally under the direct authority of the executive branch—not unlike the SSS itself) would be assured access to microfilm or other evidentiary document sources.
Are you really telling me that I can only believe tampering would have occurred if I also concede that someone spliced an archival microfilm role?!
I certainly can’t rule out that, if not by now then perhaps eventually, someone may have had to go so far as to tamper with the film, but my hypothesis is clearly, obviously in no way dependent upon anyone having to do that up to this point. Am I just not understanding your “someone would have had to splice microfilm for that to happen” argument? Or did you just really not understand why MCSO would have sent letters asking to inspect whatever the SSS is keeping in their files? Or are you just having a bad day? Or could it be that your main goal is simply to blow some fog into the discussion in the hopes that it will confuse and dissuade those who aren’t paying close enough attention to the details.
Remember, it was the noticeable presence of intellectually dishonest, half-truth telling “debunkers” on these boards that really started to spark my interest in the Obama eligibility/identity fraud questions.
Alas, I realize for the sake of time, I won’t be able to keep up with you and you’ll think yourself a winner by virtue of having the greater endurance and keeping your questions coming faster than I was able to answer them, but I will cling to some optimism that many of the people reading these boards are more discerning than you give them credit for being. They will see right through your line of reasoning.
4zoltan sees the world through the eyes of a liberal.
You have to read forward from this post to get the full gist of it:
http://209.157.64.201/focus/f-bloggers/2982757/posts?q=1&;page=251#286
“Has Mike Zullo been granted access to the SSS microfilm record or national archive microfilm records, or is anyone contending that Zullo has been granted or could be granted that access at this point?”
Did he get a court order or search warrant? If not why not?
Or did they just send a letter saying we want to come in and look at your records?
“Are you really telling me that I can only believe tampering would have occurred if I also concede that someone spliced an archival microfilm role?!”
No, but if not than are you claiming that in 2008 the Selective Service Administration, when faced with a FOIA request for Obama’s SSR card, created one from scratch, including adding a DLN from the 1980s, and a paper copy of the Makiki Station PO handstamp (but not a paper copy of the 1980 stamp even though they have thousands of examples of it).