Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus
The long form says place of birth: Honolulu; date of birth: August 4, 1961; time of birth: 7:24 p.m., Name of Hospital: Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital; and signature of attendant: Dr. David A Sinclair.

Right, the "long form" that has never been legally certified nor submitted in any court of law ...

Former Health Director Fukino’s second press release stated: “I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural born citizen.”—July 27, 2009.

Thanks for posting this. Why did Fukino change the terminology from "original birth certificate" in her Oct. 31, 2008 news release to "the original vital records" ... why did she have to look at multiple records?? If the COLB was genuine, she should only have to find this information on the original birth certificate. Remember?? She said she had "personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate ..." The only reason to mention multiple records in a follow-up is if the original birth certificate was not complete. If that's the case, then his birth certificate should indicate that it was not complete.

Second, you misquoted Fukino's statement. Why did you do this?? She didn't say Obama was "a natural born citizen." She said, he "is a natural-born American citizen." In this country, we are U.S. citizens, not American citizens. IOW, she used a legally meaningless phrase.

Third, Fukino later said that Obama's long-form was half handwritten and half typed. The PDF that Obama released in April 2011 is NOT half handwritten. So, why would she lie?? Why did Governor Lingle lie and say that Fukino's 2008 news release said that Obama was born in Kapiolani hospital when this is on NEITHER news release??

93 posted on 04/24/2013 8:31:05 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

Bump. Brilliantly stated analysis of Fukino.

In my up-thread summary for Nero (whose maniacal persecutor namesake seems fitting) I alluded to Fukino’s use of “tortured and evasive language in the two key statements she made while still the Director.” I guess I was hoping that the points you’ve made here yet again so crisply would have already been sufficiently established. Shockingly, it seems Nero may have just never considered these salient points about Fukino with which you just soundly thumped him.

The tact of so many would-be debunkers is to just keep shifting arguments in the hopes that they will outlast their challengers.

If I say the birth certificate has digital evidence of fabrication, they say layers are produced all the time by optimization processes.

If I nail them down on the specific kind layers, they raise a straw man to argue with about splicing microfilm in the national archives.

When I point out the overt absurdity of the straw man, the argument makes quick shift without apology to why a forger who got a hold of a postal round stamp would resort to a chopped up, inverted year insert.

When I explain that year inserts, unlike round stamps, are destroyed according to policy after the year for which they were made, the response comes back celebrating a 4-digit, right-side-up date stamp with a more subtle offset from center than Obama’s inverted two digit version.

I make a side comment about how Obama’s situation benefits from the fact that he appointed the director of the SSS. A debunker rises up brandishing his mighty correction that when the FOIAs started for the SSS Obama was not yet President, quietly setting aside the fact that it was Obama appointee Romo at the helm when the law enforcement disclosure rules changed and when the MCSO was denied access to probative evidence.

Nero, himself, in this thread actually resorted to an oft used fogbow tactic of regurgitating a laundry load list of all authorities opposed and cases lost.

When I sarcastically cried mercy, he managed to disengage by offering the pretense that he favored a congressional probe with witnesses testifying under oath.

I love it that you have for the moment silenced him with this clear concise illumination, once again, of the red flags that riddled Fukino’s words and greatly darkened the pall of doubt already cast over everything emanating from the HDOH.

Edge, I know you’ve been at this for quite a while, and I’m always grateful to watch when you turn up to rattle the opposition. Thanks again.


94 posted on 04/25/2013 9:43:31 PM PDT by ecinkc (Alvin T. Onaka: Long-time "public servant" who twisted technicalities to deceive a nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: edge919
...Third, Fukino later said that Obama's long-form was half handwritten and half typed...

IIRC, it was Neil Abercrombie who made that statement.

98 posted on 04/26/2013 9:00:03 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Come Visit Tasmania!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: edge919

http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/Abercrombie.htm


102 posted on 04/26/2013 9:43:02 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Come Visit Tasmania!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson