Stephen Lynch WAS actually a pro-family conservative, and we worked with him from time to time. But since going to Congress he has gone way over to the dark side and supports the homosexual agenda and similar left-wing staples. He still claims to be "personally" pro-life but vows to protect Roe v Wade and says he would block any Supreme Court nominees who would overturn that. Interestingly, Lynch voted against ObamaCare, and continues to defend that vote.
Sorry, Mike...but even with a glimmer of hope from a guy like Lynch (who I’ve met awhile back), MA is a lost cause. Even with terrorism, tax payers paying for it and Obozo’s illegal family members and a huge number of other living proofs that liberalism kills, the MA voter will vote for its continued existence...at least CA’s excuse is illegal over-run....
Blanking the vote helps Democrats, too, not that they need any more help. Anyways and unfortunately, Ed Markey won’t lose, either, the primary, or the general election. The majority of Massachusetts voters are far leftists, and Ed Markey is a far leftist.
I’m voting for Sullivan on Tuesday. Gomez is the new Scott Brown, in other words, a current republican who is really a democrat who will down the line become an “independent” because the “republican party moved away from me.”
Lynch is more conservative than Gomez in reality.
None of them are strictly 100% Conservative, but Sullivan would be good.
Remember, the northeast Republicans are not southern Republicans. We need to remember that...