You take that attitude, and a culture of no children or fatherless children results. Which is exactly what's happening in the West.
Fix the problem, don't perpetuate it!
So... you’d advise men to deliberately ignore the legal, financial and reputational risks of getting married, and just jump right on in?
Sorry, I have a habit of speaking the truth when I give advice, and the situation as I see it holds no benefits for men, only risks. When a woman can drop a dime on a guy, get him locked up, a RO issued against him, any guns that he owns seized without compensation, etc - ALL WITHOUT ANY TRIAL, there’s no question that the odds are stacked against men to a point where they have to opt out. A woman can get a divorce, take half of the assets a man has labored to earn, take his children etc - all without any ability of the man to put the brakes on the situation.
The only way of fixing the problem is to destroy the feminist grievance movement, and that’s going to take decades, and it will require an attitude of “we had to destroy the village to save it.” It’s going to have to be starved to death, and one of the ways to do this is for men to say “No” when the marriage conversation comes up.
Women did this to themselves. It’s time that women choose what they want: functional relationships, or to let the feminists run amok in the Congress, courts and press.