Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SatinDoll

In general, a pre-nup is to protect the assets of a wealthy betrothed. For example, if a wealthy groom was marrying a woman with a reputation for divorce settlements, a pre-nup clarifies the extent which she is entitled to if they divorce.

Similarly, a wealthy woman, or one who stands to inherit money from wealthy parents, might use a pre-nup against the groom to protect her assets.

Unless one of these two comes from money or expects to have money soon, I would think a pre-nup would be unnecessary. In addition, there is risk of causing marital discord because it implies one party or the other is already thinking of divorce before the marriage even begins.


12 posted on 05/17/2013 3:19:30 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Our economy won't heal until one particular black man is unemployed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OrangeHoof

“there is risk of causing marital discord because it implies one party or the other is already thinking of divorce before the marriage even begins.”

That coin has two sides. A person asked to sign a prenup should maybe try to see their new spouse as an intelligent, confident person who will address uncomfortable issues in a forthright manner. During the long marriage, that spouse will use that same critical thinking and not let any Doctor, IRS agent, salesman, realtor, etc scam your family.

In many parts of the world, a “clever” person is admired. Many think they become successful in the workplace too.
Sign it, then go be married.


43 posted on 05/17/2013 3:47:42 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: OrangeHoof
In general, a pre-nup is to protect the assets of a wealthy betrothed. For example, if a wealthy groom was marrying a woman with a reputation for divorce settlements, a pre-nup clarifies the extent which she is entitled to if they divorce.

Another circumstance would be if there were children from a preceding marriage, to ensure that stuff that was intended for the prior kids inheritance stayed that way (although creating a trust would be a better idea).

44 posted on 05/17/2013 3:50:19 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson