Posted on 05/23/2013 6:26:58 AM PDT by MichCapCon
Perhaps the best thing state legislators could do for Michigan moms would be to allow more educational options for children — at least according to the latest poll from the Friedman Foundation.
Mothers polled supported all varieties of school choice, including providing students with resources to attend public, private or religious schools.
Mothers of school-age children were surveyed by phone and asked whether they supported specific school choice programs. Nearly 70 percent of moms said that they support tax credit scholarships for students.
When asked about school vouchers, 66 percent of surveyed moms said that they supported them, with just 26 percent opposed. Mothers were much more supportive of vouchers than people who do not have children. Among different demographic groups, low-income earners and African Americans were some of the most supportive of school vouchers.
Moms also support universal eligibility for school choice: Two-thirds of surveyed moms support providing vouchers to all students, while just a third support limiting eligibility by income level. Young adults and African Americans were the demographic groups that were most supportive of universal eligibility. Republicans and independents were also supportive, while Democrats were less so.
It's hard to miss the educational establishment's fear of giving parents more control of where to educate their children. After all, public school officials started a lobbying organization with taxpayer money in order to oppose similar school reform measures. And officials have a vested interest (to put it bluntly, a paycheck) in preserving the existing system. But instead of worrying about the educational establishment’s latest email blast, legislators should pay attention to the opinions of those that our public education system is truly meant to serve.
Overall, moms of school-age children are supportive of school choice. Why not give them and their children more options? Brunch and flowers are nice for Mother’s Day, but a more lasting gift would be one that helps moms’ kids attend a school that best serves their needs.
I live in a rural area of Maine.
Our town is very large in area, very small in population.
Bus service is provided for all kids. Some are on the bus for forty minutes within the town limits.
The next town’s school would be at least an hour on the bus.
You would not believe how much we spend on buses,fuel, and drivers.
I would agree to ‘school choice’ if every parent agreed to provide transportation for their own child. In town or out.
My school district was the same way. In fact the main school building was centrally located in the country because it served multiple small towns.
Dewey: Stalin’s Propagandist, the World’s Teacher
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3022613/posts
Post 13
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3022613/posts?page=13#13
To: Slyfox
Don’t be fooled by “school choice”! As this confirms, the very concept of warehousing children is totalitarian. There have never been “good” schools. No school for children is about education.
Thank goodness, the home schoolers and unschoolers have made incredible strides in just a generation. Soon, people who dump their kids in prisons will be looked down upon.
13 posted on Wednesday, May 22, 2013 3:28:03 PM by Forgotten Amendments
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.