Certainly I do.
Everything I have posted has been backed up with 100% documentation.
No one has been able to point out any genuine flaw in the evidence or the reasoning presented.
When people have made objections, those objections have been, for the most part, complete fallacies. When I’ve pointed out those fallacies, the answer from birthers has been insistence on the fallacious arguments, vicious name-calling, and false accusations.
My understanding of our history and law is not anything radical. It is the same understanding of our history and law that virtually everybody in the country has held throughout our entire nation’s history, including every major conservative commentator who has ever spoken on the subject.
100% documented opinion.
Everything I have posted has been backed up with 100% documentation.
There's no challenging the certainty of a fool. He's absolutely convinced that what he thinks is correct, BECAUSE he thinks it's correct.
He thinks his position is "backed up" because he takes selective misquotes, out of context quotes, and truncated meanings which support his position in his own mind, and he then assumes everyone else possess the same sort of selective blindness that he does. His argument's look sensible to him, because he has trained himself to look past anything which does not fit his preconceived notions.
Again, he possesses the certainty of a fool. (And the methodology of one.)