Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ: Government Has Right to Ban Home Schooling
Semi-News/Semi-Satire ^ | 5 July 2013 | John Semmens

Posted on 07/07/2013 10:57:44 AM PDT by John Semmens

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: bboop

The Compulsory Education Act or Oregon School Law was a 1922 law in the U.S. state of Oregon that required school age children to attend only public schools. The United States Supreme Court later struck down the law as unconstitutional.

In 1922, the Masonic Grand Lodge of Oregon sponsored a bill to require all school-age children to attend public schools. With support also of the state Ku Klux Klan and 1922 Democratic gubernatorial candidate Walter M. Pierce, the Compulsory Education Law was passed. Its primary purpose was to shut down Catholic schools in Oregon, but it also affected other private and military schools. It was challenged in court and struck down by the United States Supreme Court Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925) before it went into effect.

The law, which was officially called the Compulsory Education Act and unofficially became known as the Oregon School Law, did not just require that children between the ages of eight and sixteen had to attend school; it required that they attend only public schools. By prohibiting children from attending private or parochial schools, the state thus forced such schools to close.

Outraged Catholics organized locally and nationally for the right to send their children to Catholic schools. In a 1925 decision, the United States Supreme Court declared the Oregon School Law unconstitutional in a ruling that that has been called “the Magna Carta of the parochial school system.” In the ruling, the Court asserted that “the child is not the mere creature of the state” and settled once and for all the question of whether or not private schools had a right to exist in America.

(Wikipedia)


21 posted on 07/07/2013 12:32:58 PM PDT by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

OH NO!!! It’s satire? I have been expecting this to really come to pass. The hook was set. duh........


22 posted on 07/07/2013 12:33:37 PM PDT by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

FREAK OUT !!! You had me going for a second, until I hit the link.


23 posted on 07/07/2013 12:34:19 PM PDT by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
The state's interest in promoting a child's socialization as a participant in the collective body of the nation's people is just as valid as a parent's desire to promote his values and beliefs.

Kollektiv. Now they're admitting it openly. Can we start picking 'em off NOW?

24 posted on 07/07/2013 1:03:57 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

When don’t ask / don’t tell was put into place, I was of the opinion that we needed a constitutional amendment that defined marriage. Seems I was years ahead of my time.

In that same vein, I assert now, that we need a constitutional amendment preventing Congress or the States from restricting home schooling.


25 posted on 07/07/2013 1:55:25 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

they have no right at all to ban home schooling....none


26 posted on 07/07/2013 3:32:45 PM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Heh, good one!


27 posted on 07/07/2013 4:22:02 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

The right to home school your children would seem to be protected by the 9th Amendment in the Bill of Rights.


28 posted on 07/07/2013 4:26:29 PM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Individual states have been offered federal candy to fall in line with thier programs or else


29 posted on 07/08/2013 5:55:29 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (Yesterdays conspiracies are todays truths)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Well, y’all might claim that “right”,
but iffin’ ya do it,
ya’ll better be prepared for some “backlash”...

Where’s my copy of “Unintended Consquences”, anyway?


30 posted on 07/08/2013 5:56:35 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Q: “What about socialization?”
A: “We’re not raising socialists.”


31 posted on 07/08/2013 5:58:48 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson