[kevkrom]

HuH? Virtually every point in that letter SUPPORTS Sen. Cruz’s position because an unbord child is undoubtably a person. The fact they can feel pain just proves that.

You may not be familiar to the OP's history. Anyone who proposed an incremental change to abortion laws is some hideous monster because they do not join in the crusade to immediately make all abortions illegal.

As in, saving some lives is "immoral" since not all will be saved.

Many of us have the long-term identical objectives as the OP, but because we disagree with the path to achieve those objectives, we're apparently bad people.

[EternalVigilance]

Don’t take it so personally. It’s not about you. It’s about the only principles that can possibly stop abortion: Personhood, equal protection, and the duty to keep the oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.

“No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.”

“No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Do you see any exceptions listed there for persons who cannot “feel pain”? Because I don’t.

[circlecity]

LOL - See my post #21 which I posted before you responded to me. Looks like we are on the same page. We have a word for people who won’t accept incremental gains and demand a total win or nothing - “losers”. I’m more concerned about saving as many baby’s lives as possible now than winning a point.

[BJ1]

Many of us have the long-term identical objectives as the OP, but because we disagree with the path to achieve those objectives, we're apparently bad people.

Dang, stop being bad already! Seriously tho, the OP should look at the Slut Walks from last year and the Hail Satan chants in Texas last week. IN our culture does he really think you can ban abortion overnight? How did that work out in the last 40 years? Just saying.