” Mr. Zullo was already caught presenting fabricated evidence concerning the race codemarked on the birth certificate
for the President’s father’s race
in an attempt to bolster his forgeryclaims.”
I know his “father” was listed as African. What’s the deal with the supposed “fabricated evidence?” Have I missed something?
They are saying Zullo used the wrong vital statistics coding manual in which he did not. He used a Hawaiian coding manual from 1961 that shows that ‘negro’ was used back then. Not ‘African’ as the fogbowers contend that Barack Obama Sr. self reported himself as that to the nurse when filling out the birth certificate. Also the fogbowers are now stating they no the reasons why the birth certificate has so many layers and why everyone thinks it I a forgery. Here is what one fogbower said when asked to explain how it happened:
“It’s very simple. A Xerox Workcentre 7655 is an all-in-one copier/scanner/printer/fax that is standard office equipment in many organizations. One of these organizations is the Whitehouse... and we know this because other documents that the Whitehouse has posted online were scanned on that system (such as the President’s Tax Returns). These are rather large, high volume, shared machines located in what we would have used to call a “copier room” so that a large number of people can get to it when they need it. And when they are used as scanners, the operator has to put in their e-mail address because that’s how they get the digital file; it is scanned to a PDF which the machine then emails to the operator.
When a Xerox Workcentre 7655 scans a document to email, it uses a number of proprietary and patented Xerox compression algorithms to process the document for size, legibility and quality using MRC and JBIG2 encoding. I’ll explain those more in a moment. Taken together, these algorithms automatically produce .pdf files that possess every single one of the “anomalies” that birthers have claimed are proof that the .pdf of the President’s birth certificate is a manually created forgery. These include:
1. Multiple layers consisting of one full page color JPEG and multiple monochrome bitmasks of varying sizes.
2. The bitmasks are reduced in resolution by 1/2 (i.e. the JPEG is 300 dpi, and the bitmasks are 150 dpi) and rotated 90 degrees.
3. The bitmasks can be individually selected and “moved around the image” when opened in Adobe Illustrator. They consist of “objects” that the scanner has identified as being similar enough in color and position to be considered and compressed as a single “object.”
4. Signatures and date stamps that are “broken up” and distributed across different layers.
5. Shadows and halos in the JPEG layer where the bitmasks have been separated out.
6. A “clipping mask” that crops the edge of the document and conceals a few pixels of the image along each margin (This is called “edge erase” and its purpose is to remove punch holes, images of staples or binding that detract from the image. It removes a default of 0.12 inches on all sides... precisely what is missing between the Savannah Guthrie photo of the paper original and the posted PDF.).
7. Pixel identical letters, symbols or boxes (this is part of the JBIG2 encoding process).
And finally, the metadata is identical with files that were first scanned on the Xerox, but then reopened and printed to PDF in the MAC OS standard “Preview.” Why would this last step happen? The document needed to be posted “right side up” on the Whitehouse.gov website. It apparently was originally scanned upside down. So it was opened in Preview, rotated 180 degrees, and then printed to PDF.
So... here is the exhaustive account of “human intervention” in the creation of the PDF.
1. A person loaded the original paper document into a Xerox Workcentre 7655 printer/copier/scanner fax, entered their email address and then “scanned to e-mail.”
2. A person opened the attachment on the email they received on their MAC. They noticed that the image was upside down, rotated it 180 degrees, and then printed to PDF.
4. A person posted that PDF on the Whitehouse.gov website.
That is the entire “forgery” process, right there.”
The term used for race at that time would have been Negro. In addition there is no such race as African. Africa refers to a Geographical area and not a race.