Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76

With that kind of WHut insider connection, it wouldn’t be too far-fetched to have Xerox or Adobe programmers “update” their software to behave in the far-fetched manner required within limited circumstances. Someone needs have archived the software extant at the time of the original scan for the ostensibly-generating machine. At this point I wouldn’t trust company repository driver software not to have been similarly corrupted and back-dated. Such machines may automatically update their software via the Internet or via periodic company service packs, obliterating earlier software in those cases.

At least catching them in the fashion suggested by above would be as worthy as any Columbo episode!

HF


123 posted on 08/09/2013 12:33:23 PM PDT by holden (Alter or abolish it yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: holden; Mr. K; Lazamataz

That would make more sense than hacking individual machines. Anybody with programming knowledge know how a person would detect such a scheme if it happened?


126 posted on 08/09/2013 12:41:41 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: holden

See my latest 2 comments in this thread. I think you’re onto something.


145 posted on 08/10/2013 9:08:02 AM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson