[Ray76]

We all know that “matches” does not imply complete.

Here it is again:

I have a paper with 5 items on it

You have a paper with 3 items on it

Your 3 items match 3 of my 5

What about my other 2 items?

What kind of items? Amendments.

We need the facts, not what they were made to appear as circa 2006. A BC attested “a complete and true copy” with seal provides those facts.

[BigGuy22]

Well, remember what the law says: “A verification shall be considered for all purposes certification that the vital event did occur and that the facts of the event are as stated by the applicant.”

So, even if the applicant requested verification of only the place of birth and nothing else, if the DoH verified it, it would be a self-authenticating document and constitute prima facie evidence that the President was born in Hawaii.

Of course, like any prima facie evidence, it creates only a rebuttable presumption. If you wish to counter it with evidence that he was not born in Hawaii, you're free to do so, but until you do, the presumption holds and he is legally considered to have been born in Hawaii.