Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

I would argue that, if the GOP had any sense, they would preach the gospel of free private enterprise, the opportunity to create wealth for self and family, and the blessings of liberty in a free capitalist society to the immigrants, legal and otherwise, who are here today.

The vast majority did not come here because we have the most free stuff. They came here to work. They came here to earn enough money to be able to bring other family members to the US of A and to create better lives for their families. They came because America still is known as the land of opportunity.

It’s a shame that the GOP needs to be reminded of this. Instead they are being rope-a-doped into thinking they can only win if they out-democrat the real democrats, and pander better than lifelong panderers. How ridiculous!


9 posted on 08/21/2013 7:49:07 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: bigbob
I would argue that, if the GOP had any sense, they would preach the gospel of free private enterprise, the opportunity to create wealth for self and family, and the blessings of liberty in a free capitalist society to the immigrants, legal and otherwise, who are here today.

Sadly that will be rejected on delivery by single female voters, minorities, and most of those under 30. We will need a longer-term "hearts and minds" strategy to succeed.


11 posted on 08/21/2013 7:57:54 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob
The vast majority did not come here because we have the most free stuff. They came here to work. They came here to earn enough money to be able to bring other family members to the US of A and to create better lives for their families. They came because America still is known as the land of opportunity.

Poverty

In 2010, 23 percent of immigrants and their U.S.-born children (under 18) lived in poverty, compared to 13.5 percent of natives and their children. Immigrants and their children accounted for one-fourth of all persons in poverty.

The children of immigrants account for one-third of all children in poverty.

Among the top sending countries, poverty is highest for immigrants and their young children from Mexico (35 percent), Honduras (34 percent), and Guatemala (31 percent); and lowest for those from Germany (7 percent), India (6 percent), and the Philippines (6 percent).

Welfare Use

In 2010, 36 percent of immigrant-headed households used at least one major welfare program (primarily food assistance and Medicaid) compared to 23 percent of native households.

Among the top sending countries, welfare use is highest for households headed by immigrants from Mexico (57 percent), Guatemala (55 percent), and the Dominican Republic (54 percent); and lowest for those from Canada (13 percent), Germany (10 percent), and the United Kingdom (6 percent).

Health Insurance Coverage

In 2010, 29 percent of immigrants and their U.S.-born children (under 18) lacked health insurance, compared to 13.8 percent of natives and their children.

New immigrants and their U.S.-born children account for two-thirds of the increase in the uninsured since 2000.

Among the top sending countries, the highest rates of uninsurance are for those from Guatemala (46 percent), Honduras (44 percent), El Salvador (44 percent), and Mexico (41 percent); and lowest for those from Canada (9 percent), Japan (8 percent), and Germany (5 percent).

Many immigrants make significant progress the longer they live in the country. However, on average even immigrants who have lived in the United States for 20 years have not come close to closing the gap with natives.

The poverty rate of adult immigrants who have lived in the United States for 20 years is 50 percent higher than that of adult natives.

The share of adult immigrants who have lived in the United States for 20 years who lack health insurance is twice that of adult natives.

The share of households headed by an immigrant who has lived in the United States for 20 years using one or more welfare programs is nearly twice that of native-headed households.

The share of households headed by an immigrant who has lived in the United States for 20 years that are owner occupied is 22 percent lower than that of native households.

It’s a shame that the GOP needs to be reminded of this. Instead they are being rope-a-doped into thinking they can only win if they out-democrat the real democrats, and pander better than lifelong panderers. How ridiculous!

Immigrants vote 2 to 1 for the Dems. 87% of the 1.2 million LEGAL immigrants who enter annually are minorities as defined by the USG. Thus, they become immediately eligible for affirmative action and minority business set asides.

14 posted on 08/21/2013 8:20:46 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson