Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus

Nothing you’ve posted here is relevant to anything I’ve stated. The plaintiffs in this case used a strange appeal to the UIPA based on this claim: “The inspection of the purported birth certificate for [President Obama] will ensure the health and safety of all 300 million of us by making sure that our military and our nuclear and chemical arsenals are still under our control and not in the control of any one of our enemies.” The plaintiff missed the easiest appeal which is that the public interest outweighs privacy laws under the UIPA. The HI DOH has admitted there is a public interest. It’s the whole reason they have an Obama page on their website.


341 posted on 09/18/2013 9:17:21 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

I am not interested in being relevant to what you’ve stated. Every Hawaii court that has looked at this issue has already ruled against your position. I am only interested in being consistent and factual about the actual events that have already taken place involving attempts to obtain the release of Obama’s original long form birth certificate under UIPA and/or HRS 338-18.
That is my interest.


342 posted on 09/19/2013 4:59:01 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson