I think, we the people, should demand these democrat statements and photos be brought to the floor of the house during the congressional hearings. We have a right to know what has changed their minds on Assad, specifically Kerry and Pelosi. Or were they committing treason against then president GWB, by supporting the enemy?
Why the excerpt?
No, the GW Bush administration was working with the rebels that are fighting today.
The Obama administration’s efforts are simply a continuation of the prior administrations’s efforts.
While the political appointees at the top have changed, the new appointees work for the same ultimate masters - new world order.
Yes, Pelosi, was scoring political points.
Also, however, her visit was an attempt to deceive Assad into thinking that he might have an angle to use by pitting Dems and Repubs against each other.
Of course, there is one financial power structure in America and it uses both parties as fronts to produce political theater for the public.
The CIA at its inception was run out of Rockefeller center in NYC right alongside the MI6 American HQ, and it’s basically a Yale Skull and Bones lead organization.
The financial power in America created the CIA and uses it to achieve it’s goals. There are small organizations that only report to the top, effectively allowing for all sorts of crazy things (think BCCI) to go on amidst all the double and triple agents and bureaucracy.
Around the world, the diplomatic corps is loaded with intelligence agents; the two fields are completely intermingled.
Both George W. Bush and John Kerry are Bonesmen and have family histories intimately tied to new world order.
As administrations change the politicians and their appointees simply have to play a little “musical chairs”.
It has always been clear that Assad is Saddam with a college degree. GWB was objective and correct in his assessment. Domestic political power is all Democrats care about. I’m hoping Wyden and Merkley (my Senators) vote against Obama’s military plans because they will help both Assad and his opponents in the Muslim Brotherhood.
This whole thing is a political sham covering Obama’s weakness and setting up Republicans for defeat in 2014. Going into Syria would kill more innocents either directly or through retaliation by the rebels or government. At the same time it complicates our Iran policy by creating an expectation of congressional debate before any strike on Iran’s nukes — which I believe they already have and for which NK tested recently.
I'm glad he's finally come out and openly criticized 0buma's tyrannical, unconstitutional regime, his undermining of US sovereignty, economy, and military, AND his constant divide & conquer political tactics.
Huh? What? Bush been STONE silent on all matters except for emerging out of his spa in a smoking jacket long enough to condone NSA intrusiveness while happily posing with the Kenyan, Clinton, and Carter.
"Miss Bush?"? *barf*
It is true that Bush would be taking a similar action to Obama, albeit not as amateurishly.
Yeah, Obama wants to drag us into another war so him and his Democrat buddies can make money off it, but what about the Republicans? They didn’t jump off the roof in protest, did they? I mean, wouldn’t the Republicans jump off the roof if they were seriously trying to stop this? I think the only way to defeat the Democrats is for the Republicans to jump off the roof. I even wrote them a letter and explained my philosophy. Nothing says “We’re serious” like jumping off a roof. Well, maybe if they had some big spikes on the ground to land on. Yeah, that’s the ticket. That would solve everything. What? Obama? The Democrats? What about them? What do they have to do with Syria and the Middle East?