Assuming that you are a CPA, I relate. I am not agitated, either, but your remarks are non-sequitor. I noted that the great majority of OPs here are from RCs posting chest-pounding articles saying, “Look at us, we are good, we are best, we are the real ‘church’, our guy saw Mary eating a bagel.” or some such claim.
And, just as you would say (without being agitated), “Sorry, you misunderstand, the IRC does not allow that deduction.”, it is not unkind to say, “Sorry, my FRiend, your group’s doctrines do not comport with Scripture. They are fabrications of traditions (layers & layers & layers, etc.) not based on the text.” My concern is only that the “code” says something quite different than what Rome claims and this affects people’s safety.
Actually, your previous post was the change of subject, not that there’s anything wrong with that. I ignored it and continued on the original topic.