Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot

You have posted two distinctly different notes and I would I would take from your comment this was to discredit my remarks. 1) the first shown is not a USA Treasury note. It is a version of a Fed Reserve note as indicated buy the words’ ..pay to the bearer on demand..’ Secondly the note is I would read the date as 1953 this is well into the period after Wilson and FDR who were big pushers for internationalist bankers. 2) The second $5 note apparently was printed in 1953. Pres. Kennedy was assassinated on Nov. 22,1953. Coincidental? Secondly I see the note does not have the wording of your first note i.e. payable to bearer but very simply states ‘United States Note’. I am also intrigued by the wording on this note that ‘This Note Is Legal Tender for All Debts, Public and Private’. This vastly different and more succinct than what is printed on your first example. So as for now I will hold even more so to my thoughts that Pres. Kennedy might well have been assassinated for daring to oppose the international powers and probably of the same cabal that stuck Obama in as eligible for POTUSA.


58 posted on 10/07/2013 5:01:30 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: noinfringers2
1) the first shown is not a USA Treasury note. It is a version of a Fed Reserve note as indicated buy the words’

No. The first is a United States Note, 1953.

The second is a United States Note, 1963.

Both printed by the US Treasury, not the Fed.

If the 1963 Note resulted in JFK's death, why didn't the 1953 Note kill Eisenhower?

59 posted on 10/07/2013 5:13:51 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson