I came to the conclusion sometime back, that the penultimate goal of this ‘plan’ we see the Democrats and other elites following is to reduce the population of several specific classes of people. The First is the elderly and then infants and children. Obamacare seems to be targeted at these two demographics in particular.
The second target is a bit more amorphous, it’s not so much by age or class but by work ethic. The principal tool here is the tax code and they want to be careful here because this is the same group that provides most of the actual funding for the fourth group which is their local voter base that is ‘paid for / bought off’ by other people’s money.
With all that being said I don’t think the ‘Elites’ give a damn about any of these groups of people, I think they just want to reduce the population in the long term so as to reduce the number of mouths that need or ‘want’ to be fed.
With more and more efficient automation being developed, the numbers of ‘workers’ being required to produce food and other goods is plummeting. For awhile there I wondered why would they want to reduce the population if there was a ‘profit motive’ aka accumulate a ‘fortune’ still operating. That’s always been the ‘elites’ on Wall Street’s motive.
I think that is no longer the over-riding motive anymore. I think that was exposed with the ‘Agenda 21’ from the U.N. The ‘Elites’ no longer are concerned about money as they used to be, it’s about power. The power over the ‘lesser people’, the power to make them do what you want them to do when you say to do it. In other words they want to be the new ‘nobility’ lording it over the peasantry.
And it’s easiest to have that sort of control when the population has been reduced by war, famine and disease and has been relocated to locations that the ‘Elites’ can control entirely. And that I think is the end goal, not just here... but world wide.
So now... Am I just being paranoid? Or does the various actions of the Financial and Political Elites we have been seeing over the last few years point to this being a logical conclusion?
I think the "inside" game of the progs is this:
1. Immediately put all the "extra" people into government jobs or government assistance programs. Fund the jobs and programs with borrowed money. This plan has been running since 1968 or so.
2. Since you can't do this forever (even progs realize this) you need to do something to reduce the size of the group. The elderly conveniently die, but the young have a nasty habit of producing more useless eaters. The solution: public encouragement of homosexuality, free birth control and abortion on demand.
3. Unfortunately, the sick and the elderly do not die quickly enough when in the care of modern medicine. Since the public did not have the stomach for euthanasia when that was floated under Clinton, the next best thing is Obamacare. The rationing of health care will hasten the deaths of many more useless eaters.
4. Theoretically after enough people are aborted or die early the population should reach a tipping point where the shrinking economy can support the survivors. Until that time, the measures described above remain in place. Anyone who opposes them is targeted for destruction. The prog hatred of Christians can be traced right back to points #2 and #3 above.
I could go on, but to me it makes sense. Environmentalism also fits into the picture, if you keep building it out.