ObamaCare website conceals the fact that applicants have “no reasonable expectation of privacy”

Coach is Right ^ | 10/17/13 | Doug Book

[Excellence]

It’s in the source code, but bracketed so it doesn’t show up on the website.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/sites/all/files/images/Picture%209_2.png

You will have to magnify to see it.

[mbarker12474]

On this dynaimically generated page, of "terms and conditions": https://www.healthcare.gov/marketplace/auth/global/en_US/myProfile During the registration process. The language of interest is in between the brackets below. =================================================

[mbarker12474]

In the grand scheme of things, this bit of hidden privacy boilerplate language is not that big a deal. But, for the record, here are a couple of screen shots of the "terms and conditions" page taken during the Obamacare registration process at HealthCare.gov.

First, here is an image grab of the "view source" markup of the "terms and conditions" page from the registration process for Obamacare at HealthCare.gov:

Note that the bothersome text is "commented out" via use of tags in the HTML markup.

btw... this stuff is properly called "markup" rather than "code".

And here is the page from which this source markup is being viewed. (You can do this little exercise in your browser.)

[mbarker12474]

Let me try this again... The markup text of interest is between the <!-- --> tags. Here:

<!--<p>To continue, you must accept the terms and conditions. If you decline, your login will automatically be cancelled.</p>
			<ul>
				<li>You have no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding any communication or data transiting or stored on this information system.</li>
				<li>At any time, and for any lawful Government purpose, the government may monitor, intercept, and search and seize any communication or data transiting or stored on this information system.</li>
			</ul>
			<p>Any communication or data transiting or stored on this information system may be disclosed or used for any lawful Government purpose.</p>--> 

[mbarker12474]

we need a MUCH LARGER and thus clearer more LEGIBLE..screen shot

See my posts to this thread around here and following:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3080195/posts?page=22#22

[Excellence]

It’s hidden but still enforceable?