Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why did Democrats give Obamacare an annual marriage tax of up to $11,028 per couple?
wordpress ^ | November 13, 2013 | Dan from Squirrel Hill

Posted on 11/13/2013 6:42:08 PM PST by grundle

Why did Democrats give Obamacare an annual marriage tax of up to $11,028 per couple?

In front of the U.S. Supreme Court, the Obama administration argued that Obamacare is a tax.

According to the Obamacare calulator, Obamacare places an annual tax on married couples for being married instead of single. The amount of this tax depends upon the ages, incomes, and parental status of the married couple.

According to the Obamacare calculator, the extreme case of this tax occurs with a 60-year-old married couple with no children, where the two spouses have identical incomes totaling $62,041 per year. Under this scenario, according to the Obamacare calculator, Obamacare gives them an annual tax of $11, 028 for being married instead of single.

Why did Democrats give Obamacare this marriage tax?

Everyone knows that whatever you tax, you get less of. For example, after the Democrats increased the cigarette tax by 61 cents per pack in 2009, John Seffrin, chief executive officer of the American Cancer Society, said:

“Raising the price of tobacco products is one of the most effective approaches to encouraging people to quit and preventing kids from picking up the deadly habit in the first place.”

Mr. Seffrin’s comment makes perfect sense. Everyone knows that whatever you tax, you get less of, which is why Democrats have never, and will never, create an abortion tax.

So, why did Democrats give Obamacare an annual marriage tax of up to $11,028 per couple?

I am not a Democrat, so I cannot answer that question with 100% certainly. However, I can take my best, educated guess.

The only explanation that I can think of is that Democrats want to discourage people from being married. They want to discourage single people from getting married, and they want to encourage married people to get divorced.

If that’s not their reason, then what else could their reason possibly be?



TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: economics; marriage; obamacare; taxes

1 posted on 11/13/2013 6:42:08 PM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle
"then what else could their reason possibly be?"

Unintended consequences are not something they consider. They are also bad with math. Zer0 can't write code.

2 posted on 11/13/2013 6:46:32 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

The family is man’s first government. Destroy it...you destroy the country.
Karl Marx knew this.


3 posted on 11/13/2013 6:50:16 PM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
I think you are being generous with the "Unintended". Maybe their goal was not specifically punish married couples, but I think it was to increase the government dependence of single mothers - keeping them on the plantation.

Look at the current welfare system and run the simulation of trying to slowly increase your income to wean yourself off. The system makes you go backwards in take home pay as you approach the threshold by cutting you off at a greater rate than you are increasing.

It starves you back down into the system.

4 posted on 11/13/2013 6:53:18 PM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I might be able to separate the Govt’s defn of of marriage from God’s.

Govt divorce, if it means less tax, is worth consideration.

My devotion to my wife, sworn to God, will not change.

Scru bo and the donkey he rode in on.


5 posted on 11/13/2013 6:57:19 PM PST by Scrambler Bob ( Concerning bo -- that refers to the president. If I capitalize it, I mean the dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Approve gay marriage, then penalize marriage, why?? Wealth redistribution opportunity cannot go to waste?
6 posted on 11/13/2013 7:05:40 PM PST by GizzyGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GizzyGirl

It’s all part of the Marxist plan to destroy the natural family and replace it with the government.


7 posted on 11/13/2013 7:07:11 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grundle

several reasons.

less infidels marrying.

payback to the gays.

get better father figures outside of the house, mom stays dependent on husband government.


8 posted on 11/13/2013 7:08:39 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

We will be advising some couples to open IRAs so that they will qualify for subsidies just like we do for tax bracket creep.


9 posted on 11/13/2013 7:10:13 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope

The family is man’s first government. Destroy it...you destroy the country.
Karl Marx knew this.

Maybe they are just looking to really cash in on the untapped homosexuals now that they are getting married.


10 posted on 11/13/2013 7:24:31 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Did Obama exempt gay “married” couples?


11 posted on 11/13/2013 7:30:04 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Marriage is a key component of joining the middle class. Marxists hate the middle class, ergo they wish to discourage marriage.


12 posted on 11/13/2013 7:56:34 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

If they can afford to be married and not on welfare, they deserve to have to pay out the nose as a symbol to all the unmarried/who-was-that-guy-who-impregnated -me/EBT/leeches that they will get company down in the sludge as soon as the middle class (those moralistic working snobs) is bled dry. It’s all part of leveling the field by bulldozing the grain into the mud.


13 posted on 11/14/2013 3:18:52 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson