Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

The F-111 has always drawn negative press because there were so many variants of the basic design. If any version failed to meet it’s design criteria, the press played on that. The whole F-111 program was made to look like a failure.

It was a good idea but difficult to develop one plane that could perform the various roles envisioned for the F-111. I think the F-111 (fighter) and the FB-111 (fighter/bomber) were good products. The other versions were scrapped on the drawing board or during development. But time took it toll, rolls changed, materials and computer technology improved, and the world changed.

I don’t think the author of this article did enough research to make the judgements he has made.


106 posted on 01/11/2014 7:13:36 PM PST by Texicanus (Texas, it's a whole 'nother country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Texicanus

During Red Flag exercises on straight out air to air, the F-111 sucked. But crank up it’s advantage of TFR ( Terrain Following Radar ) and it got low, no plane in the world would even try and take it. TFR used to take up half of an aircraft’s “black boxes”. Now it’s only one small chip.


107 posted on 01/11/2014 7:33:15 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson