Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland
“Bill and Hillary are intent on Chelsea having a baby soon, and then having Chelsea campaign with the baby.

“They believe Chelsea’s presence as a new mom will attract young female voters. That’s not going to sit well with her husband Marc, who’s continually felt frozen out by the Clintons. But Chelsea will do whatever she can for her mom. She’s a Clinton first and a wife second.

“Having Chelsea and the baby involved will make the family look younger and give a Kennedy-like ‘Camelot’ touch to the campaign."

Is this why they had Chelsea?

I didn't think I'd ever be surprised by the Clintons, but this surprises me. They're going to have their daughter get pregnant so they can use her baby in the presidential campaign? Is even a grandchild nothing more to them than a political tool?

43 posted on 01/25/2014 12:43:05 PM PST by Irish Rose (Will work for chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Irish Rose

I predicted this a year ago.
When William Jefferson Webster “lil Bubba” Clinton-Mezvinsky arrives, the MSM will have a granny gasm.


44 posted on 01/25/2014 12:45:25 PM PST by nascarnation (I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Irish Rose

“Is even a grandchild nothing more to them than a political tool?”

Maybe they could just get Chelsea a little Chihuahua to carry around in her purse, instead.


71 posted on 01/25/2014 1:30:28 PM PST by Avid Coug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Irish Rose

Chelsea was a mistake she is Webbs daughter


83 posted on 01/25/2014 2:11:13 PM PST by al baby (Hi MomÂ… I was refereeing to Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson