I’m guessing it is: Dr. David Jeremiah’s historical revisionism.
The horror!
It is not 'historical revisionism' when it is has been accepted history for nearly 500 years. Now if the author (Paul Melanson) wants to attack this historical account (basing his argument on self-depreciating remarks William Tyndale made about himself seems a stretch), so be it -- but Paul Melanson would be the one engaging in historical revisionism (revising the historical account of the life of William Tyndale).