....”name, place of birth and date of birth is still unkown.
As are the names of his parents consequently unknown”
IMO, while there are credible claims by the CCP that Barry’s LFBC has been forged and the behavior of Barry and his handlers betrays consciousness of that forgery, there are multiple documents in separate state (HI and WA) and federal repositories that confirm Stanley Ann as Barry’s mom and cross-corroborate a narrative of her being in Russian class in the Fall of 1960, a U of WA in the Fall of 1961 and Spring of 1962 and returning to HI in the Fall of 1962.
I have seen no credible claim by a competent expert that the INS FOIA documents are forged.
The INS FOIA documents name Stanley Ann Dunham as a student believed by the U of HI staff and reported to the INS staff to have been impregnated by BHO Sr. and married to him in Feb. 1961...even though they believe he had a wife in Kenya. Those INS docs report baby BHO II by name being born in August 1961 and his mother planning to go to a university in WA in the Fall of 1961.
These INS, U of HI and U of WA docs and witness claims of Stanley Ann’s friends have not been “proved up” in a federal court yet but they can be subjected to discovery.
IMO the apparent forgery of Barry’s LFBC does not put in doubt the identity of his mother based on the other uncontested evidence on the record.
The reason for the forgery MUST conceal something extremely damaging to Barry’s eligibility or life narrative.
For example, in the case of an adoption the original BC is defaced.