We’re discussing homoexual agenda lies, not Christian theology.
If you want to have a discussion about your particular POV of Christian theology, go start a thread about it.
The fact is there are former homosexuals.
Thanks you for attempting to redirect this discussion to the original subject matter.
While i agree there are former homosexuals, as there are former drug addicts (though i have yet to meet a totally former sinner), broadly rejecting Christian theology when dealing with homosexual agenda lies means that you hold that the former has no place in defining what lies are, but that something else can.
Certainly medical studies have weight insofar as they are valid, and related to the "nurture versus nature" debate, yet the theological aspect does also. (Gn. 4:7)
And the Bible allows that what parents can do can affect offspring, (perhaps besides nurture, as some studies indicate DNA can change thru generations due to their experiences), yet it negates justifying acting out sinful inner proclivities, a we all are born with them, but not as slaves to any particular sin, which man can at least resist in the beginning.
And refutation of attempts to negate the Biblical injunctions against homosexual relations, and find sanction for them, can be seen here , by the grace of God.