Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MarMema

Ukraine’s separation from USSR in 1991 wasn’t a military takeover by a neighbouring state.

Crimea on the other hand, was invaded by Russian troops. They can have as many referendums as they want and then some, but a vote at gun point is not considered legitimate. Generally speaking, of course, because there have been totalitarian regimes who would consider this democratic.

Separatists in Crimea have been a small minority for the past 20 years and perhaps Maidan in Kiev had a drastic fundamental effect on how Crimeans see themselves in Ukraine. I suspect it didn’t, so personally, I would’ve liked to have seen what Crimea’s choice is today, but we’ll never know.


9 posted on 03/20/2014 6:20:32 AM PDT by Ivan Mazepa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Ivan Mazepa
Crimea on the other hand, was invaded by welcomed Russian troops.
10 posted on 03/20/2014 6:25:56 AM PDT by McGruff (They say the first casualty of war is truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Ivan Mazepa
That's not the way people in Crimea are describing it on other social media. They are happy to be part of Russia.

Most of the troops were there already, according to them, and the rest were invited in.

In fact the only place I have seen it described as an invasion is here on FR. A good friend of mine is a Tatar who converted and has family there. He says everyone there is happier with Russia than the new leadership in Ukraine.

Pretty hard to see so many different views..but the ones directly from those there on social media or from those with family there ring more true.

11 posted on 03/20/2014 6:45:09 AM PDT by MarMema (Run Ted Run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson