And this story is relevant now because...his enabler is running for President.
It was a rhetorical question.
But last week, somebody on talk radio (Michael Medved)actually discussed reasons why Hillary probably WON’T be the candidate in 2016, though I realize the media is behaving as if she will be. I don’t hang on his every word, but I agree with this because its what Ive been saying since 2008. He ran the numbers on her age and I think she will be around 70 in 2016. That’s the age Reagan was, more or less, yes, yes, but I have also suspected that her health isn’t as good as his was.
So I think strategists would do themselves a favor to assume that the front runners could be ANYBODY and not fixate on a Hillary model. BTW, how old is Biden? Must be old. And you can probably count John Edwards out.
She will need someone new to handle the “Bimbo Errurptions”?