“Iirc the first two cases that reached the SCOTUS were not dismissed but used the courts variation of tabled so that they may be revisited at the courts discretion.”
IIRC, SCOTUS in all prior eligibility related cases has allowed lower court rulings to stand by refusing to grant writ of certiorari without comment. I think there is virtually no probability that SCOTUS will take up Doug Vogt’s case.
The thread article is totally incorrect, IMO (IANAL)
“Douglas Vogt has lodged with the United States Supreme Court his compelling forensic evidence that the Birth Certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, II is indisputably a forgery.”
Vogt has asked SCOTUS to review the dismissal of his case by a lower court. No evidence can be “lodged” with any appellate court including SCOTUS. An appellate court only reviews application of the law to facts properly placed in evidence at the trial court. Vogt never got as far as even getting his evidence of BC forger into a trial court, which would have required full discovery under the FRE (federal rules of evidence).
Please get off your black-robèd butts and take a case that can tell me, a not-very-humble citizen just wtf is a:
(a) Citizen of the US
(b) How exactly is it possible for a "citizen" to be born to two illegal aliens
(c) Have you any weighty thoughts about wtf "Natural Born Citizen" means?
I know you guys are really busy, and I am not addressing this to the two obvious lesbo-commies that our blessèd GOP allowed through to join you. But "Hello," Scalia, Alito, Thomas, can't you boys get one more whisky-drinking, poker-playing heterosexual American to join you in letting this issue before your august bench.
I read our COTUS, SCOTUS, and this sort of thing seems to be your responsibility. Contact me by FReepMail and I'll be a happy citizen, and so will everybody else around here.
Fondest regards,
KB