Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Manly Warrior
No you don’t. APFT standards are a just and true starting point.

Now, to be honest and fair, as a 52 YO male, I am not required to do the same “work” under those standards either. So, a 19-21 YO male should get paid more than a 52 YO male as well.

Strictly speaking, my particular job could be done by a fat couch potato. While passing the APFT is a prerequisite for keeping my job, it has nothing to do with how I perform the job.

As one woman said to me several years ago, the Army hired me for my brains, not my brawn.

8 posted on 04/11/2014 4:19:27 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

Sigh; we men just don’t get it anyway.

That women you mention was wrong too.

IIRC, females learned BRM, US weapons, basic combatives, bayonet drill in BCT too; still do. Wonder why?

Thanks for your (qualified) service. Me, I rather offered unqualified service, and boy, did the Army take me up on that!


9 posted on 04/11/2014 4:53:15 AM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson